|
Current CEEE studies on ELLs include:
Completed CEEE Studies and Articles on ELLs
include:
- Descriptive Study of Services to
Limited English Proficient Students.
A three-year project conducted in cooperation with the University
of Minnesota's National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) on
behalf of Development Associates, Inc. The study resulted in the development
of new national estimates of the number of English Language Learners
(ELLs) and the services they receive; provided information on the ways
in which services for ELLs align with challenging state and local standards;
tracked the participation of ELLs in state assessment programs and state
accountability systems; and assembled national estimates of ELLs with
disabilities and the educational services they receive.
- An Analysis of Reported State Assessment
Data on English Language Learners, conducted with with the University
of Minnesota's National Center on Educational Outcomes. The study was
a field-initiated effort funded by the U.S. Department of Education
to collect and analyze data in state education reports and web-based
report cards; document what is known about the assessment participation
and performance of English Language Learners; and generate models of
best reporting practices through a survey of state personnel and community
members.
- A
Practical Discussion of Inclusion Issues in Statewide Assessments Emerging
from Standards-Based Education Reform and Title
- Format: PDF | Pages: 26 | Copyright:
2001
This paper describes current understandings
regarding the inclusion of English language learners (ELLs) in statewide
and district assessments. Title I requirements support a philosophical
position that all students, including ELLs, should be taught to high
state content and performance standards and that schools are accountable
for their achievement. The participation of students with disabilities
receives some attention in this paper as well because policy for including
students with disabilities has shaped the way that policy makers view
the inclusion of English language learners.
- Is it Real for All Kids? A Framework
for Equitable Assessment Policies for English Language Learners.
Entire text of article:
Format: PDF
or Word
| Pages: 23
| Copyright: 1994 | Posted here with permission from Harvard
Educational Review.
Abstract
Many people in education hope that reform
will bring positive change for all students in the United States.
However, Mark LaCelle-Peterson and Charlene Rivera argue in this
groundbreaking article that, unless educational reformers reflect
seriously on the implications of assessment reform for specific
groups of students, among them students whose first language is
not English, little meaningful change will occur.
The authors present a demographic profile
of English language learners, propose a definition of educational
equity and excellence, and outline the range of educational goals
the definition implies. They argue that it is erroneous to assume
that changes that affect monolingual English students favorably
will automatically do the same for English language learners, and
offer options and recommendations for more appropriate assessment
policy and practice for English language learners.
Reference for citation:
Mark W. La Celle-Peterson and Charlene Rivera.
(1994). Is it Real for All Kids? A Framework for Equitable Assessment
Policies for English Language Learners. Harvard
Educational Review, 64(1) (Spring 1994), pp. 55-75. Retrieved
[date] from http://ceee.gwu.edu/ELLs/ELLresearch.html.
Related CEEE Studies on Migrants include:
- Migrant Trading Partners' Study,
funded through the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Migrant Education,
was a study of promising state and local practices that enhance the
continuity of migrant students' education. The study involved carrying
out four case studies of sites that act as partners in the education
of migrant children, i.e., sites between which migrant families move.
Preliminary reports of policy findings have been used by the U.S. Department
of Education in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act. Documentation of the cases and the final technical report
was completed in June 1999. The report was published by the Center in
the fall of 1999.
|